|
2009-2010 session
AB 920 HuffmanSolar and wind distributed generation.An act to amend Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to energy.
NEW! AB 920 widget
Display AB 920 details on your website. Copy and paste the HTML code above. Status:
Chaptered Oct. 11, 2009
Chaptered Location:
Secretary of State
Scheduled hearings:
None
Vote required
Appropriations
Local program
Urgency
Tax levy
Majority
No
Yes
No
No
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy ... »More
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy procurement plan for each electrical corporation pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The program requires that a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers, but not including local publicly owned electric utilities, purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year. Under existing law the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility is responsible for implementing and enforcing a renewables portfolio standard thatrecognizes the intent of the Legislature to encourage renewable resources, while taking into consideration the effect of the standard on rates, reliability, and financial resources and the goal of environmental improvement. Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric distribution utility or cooperative, as defined, upon request, to make available to an eligible customer?generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer?generators exceeds a specified amount. Existing law provides that where the electricity generated by the eligible customer-generator exceeds the electricity supplied by the electric distribution utility or cooperative during a 12-month period, the eligible customer-generator is a net electricity producer and the electric distribution utility or cooperative retains any excesskilowatthours generated and the customer-generator is not owed compensation for those excess kilowatthours unless the electric distribution utility or cooperative enters into a purchase agreement with the eligible customer-generator for those excess kilowatthours. This bill would replace the definition of electric distribution utility or cooperative in existing law relative to private energy producers with a definition of electric utility. The bill would require the ratemaking authority, as defined, for the electric utility to adopt, by January 1, 2011, a net surplus electricity compensation valuation to compensate a net surplus customer-generator, as defined, for the value of net surplus electricity, as defined, generated by an eligible customer-generator and delivered to the grid that is in excess of the amount of electricity that is delivered from the grid to the eligible customer-generator. The bill would require the electric utility to offer a standardcontract or tariff to eligible customer-generators that includes compensation for the value of net surplus electricity. The bill would require the electric utility, upon an affirmative election by the eligible customer-generator to receive service pursuant to this contract or tariff, to either: (1) provide net surplus electricity compensation for any net surplus electricity generated in the 12-month period, or (2) allow the eligible customer-generator to apply the net surplus electricity as a credit for kilowatthours subsequently supplied by the electric utility to the surplus customer-generator. The bill would, for an electric utility that is an electrical corporation or electrical cooperative, authorize the commission to adopt requirements for providing notice and the manner by which eligible customer-generators may elect to receive net surplus electricity compensation. The bill would provide that upon adoption of the net surplus electricity compensation rate and the eligible customer-generator electing toreceive net surplus electricity compensation, any renewable energy credit, as defined, for net surplus electricity belongs to the electric utility purchasing the electricity and that net surplus electricity counts toward the electric utilitys renewables portfolio standard purchasing requirements. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, proposed by AB 560, to be operative only if AB 560 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require action by the commission to implement certain of its requirements that expand the existing obligations of electrical corporations, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding thedefinition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. »Less
Bill history [ Beta! ]
Location: Governor Governor
Oct. 11, 2009
Approved by the Governor. Author:
Huffman, LEAD_AUTHOR
Hancock, COAUTHOR Lieu, COAUTHOR Lowenthal, COAUTHOR Portantino, COAUTHOR Subject:
Solar and wind distributed generation.
An act to amend Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to energy. Action:
Chaptered
Substantive changes:
Vote required
Appropriations
Fiscal commitee
Local program
Urgency
Tax levy
Majority
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy ... »More
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy procurement plan for each electrical corporation pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The program requires that a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers, but not including local publicly owned electric utilities, purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year. Under existing law the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility is responsible for implementing and enforcing a renewables portfolio standard thatrecognizes the intent of the Legislature to encourage renewable resources, while taking into consideration the effect of the standard on rates, reliability, and financial resources and the goal of environmental improvement. Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric distribution utility or cooperative, as defined, upon request, to make available to an eligible customer?generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer?generators exceeds a specified amount. Existing law provides that where the electricity generated by the eligible customer-generator exceeds the electricity supplied by the electric distribution utility or cooperative during a 12-month period, the eligible customer-generator is a net electricity producer and the electric distribution utility or cooperative retains any excesskilowatthours generated and the customer-generator is not owed compensation for those excess kilowatthours unless the electric distribution utility or cooperative enters into a purchase agreement with the eligible customer-generator for those excess kilowatthours. This bill would replace the definition of electric distribution utility or cooperative in existing law relative to private energy producers with a definition of electric utility. The bill would require the ratemaking authority, as defined, for the electric utility to adopt, by January 1, 2011, a net surplus electricity compensation valuation to compensate a net surplus customer-generator, as defined, for the value of net surplus electricity, as defined, generated by an eligible customer-generator and delivered to the grid that is in excess of the amount of electricity that is delivered from the grid to the eligible customer-generator. The bill would require the electric utility to offer a standardcontract or tariff to eligible customer-generators that includes compensation for the value of net surplus electricity. The bill would require the electric utility, upon an affirmative election by the eligible customer-generator to receive service pursuant to this contract or tariff, to either: (1) provide net surplus electricity compensation for any net surplus electricity generated in the 12-month period, or (2) allow the eligible customer-generator to apply the net surplus electricity as a credit for kilowatthours subsequently supplied by the electric utility to the surplus customer-generator. The bill would, for an electric utility that is an electrical corporation or electrical cooperative, authorize the commission to adopt requirements for providing notice and the manner by which eligible customer-generators may elect to receive net surplus electricity compensation. The bill would provide that upon adoption of the net surplus electricity compensation rate and the eligible customer-generator electing toreceive net surplus electricity compensation, any renewable energy credit, as defined, for net surplus electricity belongs to the electric utility purchasing the electricity and that net surplus electricity counts toward the electric utilitys renewables portfolio standard purchasing requirements. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, proposed by AB 560, to be operative only if AB 560 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require action by the commission to implement certain of its requirements that expand the existing obligations of electrical corporations, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding thedefinition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. »Less
Sept. 28, 2009
Enrolled and to the Governor at 11:30 a.m. Sept. 21, 2009
House: A
Type: CSA1 Committe code: CZ01 Committee name: ASSEMBLY FLOOR ANALYSIS Released floor: Y MSWord Sept. 21, 2009
Author:
Huffman, LEAD_AUTHOR
Hancock, COAUTHOR Lieu, COAUTHOR Lowenthal, COAUTHOR Portantino, COAUTHOR Subject:
Solar and wind distributed generation.
An act to amend Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to energy. Action:
Enrolled
Substantive changes:
Vote required
Appropriations
Fiscal commitee
Local program
Urgency
Tax levy
Majority
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy ... »More
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy procurement plan for each electrical corporation pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The program requires that a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers, but not including local publicly owned electric utilities, purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year. Under existing law the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility is responsible for implementing and enforcing a renewables portfolio standard thatrecognizes the intent of the Legislature to encourage renewable resources, while taking into consideration the effect of the standard on rates, reliability, and financial resources and the goal of environmental improvement. Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric distribution utility or cooperative, as defined, upon request, to make available to an eligible customer?generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer?generators exceeds a specified amount. Existing law provides that where the electricity generated by the eligible customer-generator exceeds the electricity supplied by the electric distribution utility or cooperative during a 12-month period, the eligible customer-generator is a net electricity producer and the electric distribution utility or cooperative retains any excesskilowatthours generated and the customer-generator is not owed compensation for those excess kilowatthours unless the electric distribution utility or cooperative enters into a purchase agreement with the eligible customer-generator for those excess kilowatthours. This bill would replace the definition of electric distribution utility or cooperative in existing law relative to private energy producers with a definition of electric utility. The bill would require the ratemaking authority, as defined, for the electric utility to adopt, by January 1, 2011, a net surplus electricity compensation valuation to compensate a net surplus customer-generator, as defined, for the value of net surplus electricity, as defined, generated by an eligible customer-generator and delivered to the grid that is in excess of the amount of electricity that is delivered from the grid to the eligible customer-generator. The bill would require the electric utility to offer a standardcontract or tariff to eligible customer-generators that includes compensation for the value of net surplus electricity. The bill would require the electric utility, upon an affirmative election by the eligible customer-generator to receive service pursuant to this contract or tariff, to either: (1) provide net surplus electricity compensation for any net surplus electricity generated in the 12-month period, or (2) allow the eligible customer-generator to apply the net surplus electricity as a credit for kilowatthours subsequently supplied by the electric utility to the surplus customer-generator. The bill would, for an electric utility that is an electrical corporation or electrical cooperative, authorize the commission to adopt requirements for providing notice and the manner by which eligible customer-generators may elect to receive net surplus electricity compensation. The bill would provide that upon adoption of the net surplus electricity compensation rate and the eligible customer-generator electing toreceive net surplus electricity compensation, any renewable energy credit, as defined, for net surplus electricity belongs to the electric utility purchasing the electricity and that net surplus electricity counts toward the electric utilitys renewables portfolio standard purchasing requirements. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, proposed by AB 560, to be operative only if AB 560 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require action by the commission to implement certain of its requirements that expand the existing obligations of electrical corporations, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding thedefinition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. »Less
Location: Assembly Floor
Sept. 12, 2009
Ayes: 54
Noes: 23
Abstain: 2
Motion:
AB 920 HUFFMAN Concurrence in Senate Amendments
Anthony Adams Tom Ammiano Juan Arambula Karen Bass Jim Beall Sam Blakeslee Marty Block Bob Blumenfield Bonnie Lowenthal Steven Bradford Julia Brownley Joan Buchanan Anna Marie Caballero Wilmer Carter Charles Calderon Wesley Chesbro Joe Coto Mike Davis Hector De La Torre Kevin De Leon Bill Emmerson Mike Eng Noreen Evans Mike Feuer Nathan Fletcher Paul Fong Felipe Fuentes Isadore Hall Mary Hayashi Ed Hernandez Jerry Hill Jared William Huffman John Pérez Dave Jones Paul Krekorian Ted W. Lieu Fiona Ma Tony Mendoza William Monning Pedro Nava Brian Nestande Anthony Portantino Ira Ruskin Mary Salas Lori Saldaña Nancy Skinner Cameron Smyth Jose Solorio Sandre Swanson Tom Torlakson Norma Torres Alberto Torrico V. Manuel Perez Mariko Yamada Joel Anderson Audra Strickland Bill Berryhill Connie Conway Paul Cook Chuck DeVore Jean Fuller Ted Gaines Martin Garrick Danny Gilmore Curt Hagman Diane Harkey Alyson Huber Kevin Jeffries Steve Knight Dan Logue Jeff Miller Roger Niello Jim Nielsen Jim Silva Tom Berryhill Van Tran Michael Villines Warren Furutani Cathleen Galgiani
Location: Assembly E&E AssemblyE&E
Sept. 12, 2009
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 54. Noes 23. Page 3404.)
Location: Senate Floor
Sept. 11, 2009
Ayes: 21
Noes: 18
Abstain: 1
Motion:
Assembly 3rd Reading AB920 Huffman By Hancock
Elaine Alquist Ron Calderon Gilbert Cedillo Ellen Corbett Mark DeSaulnier Denise Moreno Ducheny Dean Florez Loni Hancock Christine Kehoe Mark Leno Alan Lowenthal Jenny Oropeza Alex Padilla Fran Pavley Curren Price Gloria Romero Joseph Simitian Darrell Steinberg Patricia Wiggins Lois Wolk Leland Yee Sam Aanestad Roy Ashburn John J. Benoit Dave Cogdill Lou Correa Dave Cox Jeff Denham Robert Dutton Tom Harman Dennis Hollingsworth Bob Huff Abel Maldonado Gloria Negrete McLeod George Runner Tony Strickland Mimi Walters Roderick Wright Mark Wyland Carol Liu
Location: Senate Desk SenateDesk
Sept. 11, 2009
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 18. Page 2430.) Sept. 10, 2009
Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on third reading file.
Location: Senate Committee Sen Rules Sen Rules
Sept. 9, 2009
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
Location: Senate Floor Sen Sen. Floor Analyses
Sept. 8, 2009
Read second time. To third reading.
House: S
Type: FLOOR Committe code: CZ09 Committee name: Sen. Floor Analyses Released floor: Y MSWord Sept. 4, 2009
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
House: S
Type: FLOOR Committe code: CZ09 Committee name: Sen. Floor Analyses Released floor: Y MSWord Author:
Huffman, LEAD_AUTHOR
Hancock, COAUTHOR Lieu, COAUTHOR Lowenthal, COAUTHOR Portantino, COAUTHOR Subject:
Solar and wind distributed generation.
An act to amend Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to energy. Action:
Amended Senate
Substantive changes:
Vote required
Appropriations
Fiscal commitee
Local program
Urgency
Tax levy
Majority
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy ... »More
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy procurement plan for each electrical corporation pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The program requires that a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers, but not including local publicly owned electric utilities, purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year. Under existing law the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility is responsible for implementing and enforcing a renewables portfolio standard thatrecognizes the intent of the Legislature to encourage renewable resources, while taking into consideration the effect of the standard on rates, reliability, and financial resources and the goal of environmental improvement. Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric distribution utility or cooperative, as defined, upon request, to make available to an eligible customer?generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer?generators exceeds a specified amount. Existing law provides that where the electricity generated by the eligible customer-generator exceeds the electricity supplied by the electric distribution utility or cooperative during a 12-month period, the eligible customer-generator is a net electricity producer and the electric distribution utility or cooperative retains any excesskilowatthours generated and the customer-generator is not owed compensation for those excess kilowatthours unless the electric distribution utility or cooperative enters into a purchase agreement with the eligible customer-generator for those excess kilowatthours. This bill would replace the definition of electric distribution utility or cooperative in existing law relative to private energy producers with a definition of electric utility. The bill would require the ratemaking authority, as defined, for the electric utility to adopt, by January 1, 2011, a net surplus electricity compensation valuation to compensate a net surplus customer-generator, as defined, for the value of net surplus electricity, as defined, generated by an eligible customer-generator and delivered to the grid that is in excess of the amount of electricity that is delivered from the grid to the eligible customer-generator. The bill would require the electric utility to offer a standardcontract or tariff to eligible customer-generators that includes compensation for the value of net surplus electricity. The bill would require the electric utility, upon an affirmative election by the eligible customer-generator to receive service pursuant to this contract or tariff, to either: (1) provide net surplus electricity compensation for any net surplus electricity generated in the 12-month period, or (2) allow the eligible customer-generator to apply the net surplus electricity as a credit for kilowatthours subsequently supplied by the electric utility to the surplus customer-generator. The bill would, for an electric utility that is an electrical corporation or electrical cooperative, authorize the commission to adopt requirements for providing notice and the manner by which eligible customer-generators may elect to receive net surplus electricity compensation. The bill would provide that upon adoption of the net surplus electricity compensation rate and the eligible customer-generator electing toreceive net surplus electricity compensation, any renewable energy credit, as defined, for net surplus electricity belongs to the electric utility purchasing the electricity and that net surplus electricity counts toward the electric utilitys renewables portfolio standard purchasing requirements. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, proposed by AB 560, to be operative only if AB 560 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require action by the commission to implement certain of its requirements that expand the existing obligations of electricalcorporations, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. »Less
Sept. 1, 2009
Read second time. To third reading.
House: S
Type: FLOOR Committe code: CZ09 Committee name: Sen. Floor Analyses Released floor: Y MSWord Aug. 31, 2009
(received by desk August 28, 2009 pursuant to JR61(a)(11)) Aug. 27, 2009
Ayes: 8
Noes: 5
Abstain: 0
Motion:
Do pass.
Ellen Corbett Loni Hancock Christine Kehoe Mark Leno Jenny Oropeza Curren Price Lois Wolk Leland Yee Dave Cox Jeff Denham George Runner Mimi Walters Mark Wyland
House: S
Type: CMTE Committe code: CS61 Committee name: Sen. Appropriations Released floor: Y MSWord Aug. 17, 2009
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file. Ayes: 13
Noes: 0
Abstain: 0
Motion:
Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.
Ellen Corbett Dave Cox Jeff Denham Loni Hancock Christine Kehoe Mark Leno Jenny Oropeza Curren Price George Runner Mimi Walters Lois Wolk Mark Wyland Leland Yee
House: S
Type: CMTE Committe code: CS61 Committee name: Sen. Appropriations Released floor: Y MSWord July 20, 2009
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. July 8, 2009
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 7).
Location: Sen Energy, Utilities and Communications
July 7, 2009
Ayes: 6
Noes: 4
Abstain: 1
Motion:
Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.
Ellen Corbett Christine Kehoe Alan Lowenthal Alex Padilla Joseph Simitian Patricia Wiggins John J. Benoit Ron Calderon Dave Cox Roderick Wright Tony Strickland
Location: Sen Sen. Energy, Utilities And Communications
July 6, 2009
House: S
Type: CMTE Committe code: CS71 Committee name: Sen. Energy, Utilities and Communications Released floor: Y MSWord
Location: Senate Committee Sen Energy, Utilities and Communications Sen Energy, Utilities and Communications
June 11, 2009
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
Location: Senate Rules SenateRules
June 2, 2009
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
Location: Assembly Floor
June 1, 2009
Ayes: 51
Noes: 26
Abstain: 3
Motion:
AB 920 HUFFMAN Assembly Third Reading
Anthony Adams Tom Ammiano Juan Arambula Karen Bass Jim Beall Sam Blakeslee Bob Blumenfield Bonnie Lowenthal Julia Brownley Joan Buchanan Anna Marie Caballero Wilmer Carter Charles Calderon Wesley Chesbro Joe Coto Mike Davis Hector De La Torre Kevin De Leon Mike Eng Noreen Evans Mike Feuer Paul Fong Felipe Fuentes Cathleen Galgiani Isadore Hall Mary Hayashi Ed Hernandez Jerry Hill Jared William Huffman John Pérez Paul Krekorian Ted W. Lieu Fiona Ma Tony Mendoza William Monning Pedro Nava Brian Nestande Anthony Portantino Curren Price Ira Ruskin Mary Salas Lori Saldaña Nancy Skinner Cameron Smyth Jose Solorio Sandre Swanson Tom Torlakson Norma Torres Alberto Torrico V. Manuel Perez Mariko Yamada Joel Anderson Audra Strickland Bill Berryhill Connie Conway Paul Cook Chuck DeVore Mike Duvall Bill Emmerson Nathan Fletcher Jean Fuller Ted Gaines Martin Garrick Danny Gilmore Curt Hagman Diane Harkey Alyson Huber Kevin Jeffries Steve Knight Dan Logue Jeff Miller Roger Niello Jim Nielsen Jim Silva Tom Berryhill Van Tran Michael Villines Marty Block Warren Furutani Dave Jones
Location: Assembly E&E AssemblyE&E
June 1, 2009
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 26. Page 1884.) May 30, 2009
House: A
Type: ATR Committe code: CZ01 Committee name: ASSEMBLY FLOOR ANALYSIS Released floor: Y MSWord May 29, 2009
Read second time. To third reading.
Location: Asm Appropriations
May 28, 2009
Ayes: 12
Noes: 5
Abstain: 0
Motion:
Do pass.
Tom Ammiano Charles Calderon Mike Davis Kevin De Leon Felipe Fuentes Isadore Hall John Pérez Paul Krekorian Curren Price Nancy Skinner Jose Solorio Tom Torlakson Audra Strickland Mike Duvall Diane Harkey Jeff Miller Jim Nielsen May 6, 2009
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. May 5, 2009
Location: Assembly Committee AssemblyCommittee
April 28, 2009
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 27).
Location: Asm Natural Resources
April 27, 2009
Ayes: 6
Noes: 3
Abstain: 0
Motion:
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Julia Brownley Wesley Chesbro Kevin De Leon Jerry Hill Jared William Huffman Nancy Skinner Danny Gilmore Steve Knight Dan Logue April 24, 2009
Location: Assembly Committee AssemblyCommittee
April 21, 2009
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (April 20).
Location: Asm Utilities and Commerce
April 20, 2009
Ayes: 11
Noes: 3
Abstain: 1
Motion:
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Natural Resources.
Sam Blakeslee Wilmer Carter Hector De La Torre Paul Fong Felipe Fuentes Jared William Huffman Paul Krekorian Nancy Skinner Cameron Smyth Sandre Swanson Alberto Torrico Mike Duvall Jean Fuller Tom Berryhill Warren Furutani
Location: Asm Utilities And Commerce
April 17, 2009
House: A
Type: ABPCA Committe code: CX23 Committee name: UTILITIES AND COMMERCE Released floor: Y MSWord
Location: Assembly Committee Asm Utilities and Commerce Asm Utilities and Commerce
March 26, 2009
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
Location: Assembly Desk AssemblyDesk
Feb. 27, 2009
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29. Feb. 26, 2009
Read first time. To print. Author:
Huffman, LEAD_AUTHOR
Hancock, COAUTHOR Lieu, COAUTHOR Lowenthal, COAUTHOR Portantino, COAUTHOR Subject:
Solar and wind distributed generation.
An act to amend Section 2827 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to energy. Action:
Introduced
Substantive changes:
Vote required
Appropriations
Fiscal commitee
Local program
Urgency
Tax levy
Majority
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy ... »More
Digest: The existing Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the Public Utilities Commission with respect to the purchase of electricity and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy procurement plan for each electrical corporation pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The program requires that a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers, but not including local publicly owned electric utilities, purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year. Under existing law the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility is responsible for implementing and enforcing a renewables portfolio standard thatrecognizes the intent of the Legislature to encourage renewable resources, while taking into consideration the effect of the standard on rates, reliability, and financial resources and the goal of environmental improvement. Existing law relative to private energy producers requires every electric distribution utility or cooperative, as defined, upon request, to make available to an eligible customer?generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer?generators exceeds a specified amount. Existing law provides that where the electricity generated by the eligible customer-generator exceeds the electricity supplied by the electric distribution utility or cooperative during a 12-month period, the eligible customer-generator is a net electricity producer and the electric distribution utility or cooperative retains any excesskilowatthours generated and the customer-generator is not owed compensation for those excess kilowatthours unless the electric distribution utility or cooperative enters into a purchase agreement with the eligible customer-generator for those excess kilowatthours. This bill would replace the definition of electric distribution utility or cooperative in existing law relative to private energy producers with a definition of electric utility. The bill would require the ratemaking authority, as defined, for the electric utility to adopt, by January 1, 2011, a net surplus electricity compensation valuation to compensate a net surplus customer-generator, as defined, for the value of net surplus electricity, as defined, generated by an eligible customer-generator and delivered to the grid that is in excess of the amount of electricity that is delivered from the grid to the eligible customer-generator. The bill would require the electric utility to offer a standardcontract or tariff to eligible customer-generators that includes compensation for the value of net surplus electricity. The bill would require the electric utility, upon an affirmative election by the eligible customer-generator to receive service pursuant to this contract or tariff, to either: (1) provide net surplus electricity compensation for any net surplus electricity generated in the 12-month period, or (2) allow the eligible customer-generator to apply the net surplus electricity as a credit for kilowatthours subsequently supplied by the electric utility to the surplus customer-generator. The bill would, for an electric utility that is an electrical corporation or electrical cooperative, authorize the commission to adopt requirements for providing notice and the manner by which eligible customer-generators may elect to receive net surplus electricity compensation. The bill would provide that upon adoption of the net surplus electricity compensation rate and the eligible customer-generator electing toreceive net surplus electricity compensation, any renewable energy credit, as defined, for net surplus electricity belongs to the electric utility purchasing the electricity and that net surplus electricity counts toward the electric utilitys renewables portfolio standard purchasing requirements. Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require action by the commission to implement certain of its requirements that expand the existing obligations of electrical corporations, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the definition of a crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establishprocedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. »Less
|




