2009-2010 session

SB 1398 ( DeSaulnier )

Property tax revenue allocations: public utilities: qualified property.

An act to amend Section 100 of, and to add Section 100.96 to, the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to local government finance.
SB 1398 widget
Display SB 1398 details on your website. Copy and paste the HTML code below.
Status:
Amended Assembly Aug. 31, 2010
In Floor Process  
Location:
Senate Floor
Scheduled hearings:
None
Latest bill language

HTML   PDF
 
Vote required
Appropriations
Local program
Urgency
Tax levy
Two Thirds
No
Yes
No
No
Digest:  (1) The California Constitution requires the State Board of Equalization to assess the property, other than franchises, of companies transmitting or selling gas or electricity. Existing property tax law provides for the valuation, as a unit, of ... »More

Bill history [ Beta! ]

Location: Sen Sen. Floor Analyses
Oct. 6, 2010
Aug. 31, 2010
 Vote: Assembly Floor
Ayes: 63
Noes: 10
Abstain: 5
Aug. 31, 2010
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 10. Page 6961.) To Senate.
 Vote: Asm Appropriations
Ayes: 12
Noes: 3
Abstain: 2
 Version: Amended Assembly
Aug. 30, 2010
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 6872.)
Aug. 26, 2010
Read second time. To third reading.
Aug. 25, 2010
(Heard in committee on August 25.)
 Vote: Asm Local Government
Ayes: 6
Noes: 0
Abstain: 3
Aug. 24, 2010
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 6608.)
Aug. 23, 2010
Re-referred to Com. On L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
Aug. 20, 2010
 Vote: Assembly Floor
Ayes: 48
Noes: 26
Abstain: 5
Aug. 20, 2010
Read third time. Amended. (Ayes 48. Noes 26. Page 6439.) To third reading.
 Version: Amended Assembly
Aug. 19, 2010
Aug. 18, 2010
Read second time. To third reading.
Aug. 17, 2010
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
 Version: Amended Assembly
Aug. 16, 2010
(Heard in committee August 12.)
Aug. 12, 2010
 Vote: Asm Appropriations
Ayes: 12
Noes: 4
Abstain: 1
Aug. 5, 2010
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
Aug. 3, 2010
July 1, 2010
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
June 30, 2010
 Vote: Asm Local Government
Ayes: 5
Noes: 0
Abstain: 4
June 29, 2010
June 10, 2010
To Com. on L. GOV.
June 3, 2010
 Vote: Senate Floor
Ayes: 30
Noes: 3
Abstain: 5
June 3, 2010
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 3. Page 3790.) To Assembly.
June 1, 2010
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
 Version: Amended Senate
May 28, 2010
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3675.)
May 27, 2010
 Vote: Sen Appropriations
Ayes: 7
Noes: 3
Abstain: 1
May 21, 2010
(Suspense - for vote only.)
May 3, 2010
Placed on APPR suspense file.
 Vote: Sen Appropriations
Ayes: 10
Noes: 0
Abstain: 1
April 22, 2010
Set for hearing May 3.
April 20, 2010
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3307.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
April 19, 2010
 Vote: Sen Local Government
Ayes: 3
Noes: 2
Abstain: 0
April 16, 2010
Set for hearing April 19.
April 15, 2010
Joint Rule 61(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3209.)
April 14, 2010
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
 Version: Amended Senate
March 16, 2010
Set for hearing April 21.
March 11, 2010
To Com. on L. GOV.
Feb. 21, 2010
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
Feb. 19, 2010
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
 Version: Introduced
Headlines 1 - 3 (of 3):

Fighting for Taxpayers in the Capitol: Against the Odds
Fox & Hounds Daily, Sept. 8, 2010
... gh this measure was ultimately approved, there remains a high likelihood of a gubernatorial veto. SB 1398 (DeSaulnier): This bill transferred over $2 million from special districts in Contra Costa County to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency in order to incentivize and site a powe ...

Oakley Redevelopment Agency payola raises questions
Halfway To Concord (Contra Costa), Aug. 31, 2010
... David Wolfe, Legislative Director for the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. According to Wolfe, SB 1398 provides that the additional property tax revenues that will go to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency will not count as “tax increment.” Tax increment is the primary ...

NEW: Redevelopment giveaway for Oakley?
CalWatchdog, Aug. 31, 2010
... vid Wolfe, Legislative Director for the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. According to Wolfe, SB 1398 provides that the additional property tax revenues that will go to the Oakley Redevelopment Agency will not count as “tax increment.” Tax increment is the primary ...

- // STRIPE FORM