An act to amend Sections 26840.7 and 26840.8 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 18293, 18304, and 18305 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to domestic violence.
SB 662 widget Display SB 662 details on your website. Copy and paste the HTML code below.
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance ... »More
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance of an authorization for the performance of marriages without a license, in the amount of $23. Existing law requires the additional $23 fee to be collected by the county clerk for deposit into county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. Existing law requires fees collected in the special funds to be disbursed to approved domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet certain requirements on a yearly or more frequent basis. This bill would authorize a county board of supervisors to authorize an increase of the above-described fee from $23 to $33. Existing law providesthat proposed or existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements shall receive funding from the county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. This bill would, instead, provide that only existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the requirements shall receive funding. Existing law allows specified local jurisdictions to retain fees received at the time of issuance of a marriage license in excess of the $23 fee. This bill would add Sonoma County as a jurisdiction to whom this provision applies. Existing law requires the money in the special funds to be disbursed using a request for qualification (RFQ) process. Thisbill would require the RFQ process to involve a determination of whether a domestic violence shelter-based program meets the aforementioned requirements. If a domestic violence shelter-based program meets those requirements, the bill would provide that the program has successfully completed the RFQ process. The bill would provide that an RFQ process shall not be construed to mean a competitive bidding process. Existing law authorizes a county to establish a program for reducing the incidence of domestic violence in the county by establishing or funding domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements. Existing law authorizes geographically adjacent counties to combine their respective domestic violence shelter-based programs funds in order to establish one or more domestic violence shelter-based programs, in order to provide services to the clients of each county that combines its funds with another county. This bill would provide that a county may only fund a domestic violence shelter-based program that is located outside of the county if the funding county is funding all domestic violence shelter-based programs located within its borders that meet the aforementioned requirements and the program located outside of the funding county provides services to residents of the funding county. »Less
Domestic violence: marriage license fees.
An act to amend Sections 26840.7 and 26840.8 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 18293, 18304, and 18305 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to domestic violence.
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance ... »More
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance of an authorization for the performance of marriages without a license, in the amount of $23. Existing law requires the additional $23 fee to be collected by the county clerk for deposit into county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. Existing law requires fees collected in the special funds to be disbursed to approved domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet certain requirements on a yearly or more frequent basis. This bill would authorize a county board of supervisors to authorize an increase of the above-described fee from $23 to $33. Existing law providesthat proposed or existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements shall receive funding from the county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. This bill would, instead, provide that only existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the requirements shall receive funding. Existing law allows specified local jurisdictions to retain fees received at the time of issuance of a marriage license in excess of the $23 fee. This bill would add Sonoma County as a jurisdiction to whom this provision applies. Existing law requires the money in the special funds to be disbursed using a request for qualification (RFQ) process. Thisbill would require the RFQ process to involve a determination of whether a domestic violence shelter-based program meets the aforementioned requirements. If a domestic violence shelter-based program meets those requirements, the bill would provide that the program has successfully completed the RFQ process. The bill would provide that an RFQ process shall not be construed to mean a competitive bidding process. Existing law authorizes a county to establish a program for reducing the incidence of domestic violence in the county by establishing or funding domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements. Existing law authorizes geographically adjacent counties to combine their respective domestic violence shelter-based programs funds in order to establish one or more domestic violence shelter-based programs, in order to provide services to the clients of each county that combines its funds with another county. This bill would provide that a county may only fund a domestic violence shelter-based program that is located outside of the county if the funding county is funding all domestic violence shelter-based programs located within its borders that meet the aforementioned requirements and the program located outside of the funding county provides services to residents of the funding county. »Less
Domestic violence: marriage license fees.
An act to amend Sections 26840.7 and 26840.8 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 18293, 18304, and 18305 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to domestic violence.
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance ... »More
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance of an authorization for the performance of marriages without a license, in the amount of $23. Existing law requires the additional $23 fee to be collected by the county clerk for deposit into county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. Existing law requires fees collected in the special funds to be disbursed to approved domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet certain requirements on a yearly or more frequent basis. This bill would authorize a county board of supervisors to authorize an increase of the above-described fee from $23 to $33. Existing law providesthat proposed or existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements shall receive funding from the county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. This bill would, instead, provide that only existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the requirements shall receive funding. Existing law allows specified local jurisdictions to retain fees received at the time of issuance of a marriage license in excess of the $23 fee. This bill would add Sonoma County as a jurisdiction to whom this provision applies. Existing law requires the money in the special funds to be disbursed using a request for qualification (RFQ) process. Thisbill would require the RFQ process to involve a determination of whether a domestic violence shelter-based program meets the aforementioned requirements. If a domestic violence shelter-based program meets those requirements, the bill would provide that the program has successfully completed the RFQ process. The bill would provide that an RFQ process shall not be construed to mean a competitive bidding process. Existing law authorizes a county to establish a program for reducing the incidence of domestic violence in the county by establishing or funding domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements. Existing law authorizes geographically adjacent counties to combine their respective domestic violence shelter-based programs funds in order to establish one or more domestic violence shelter-based programs, in order to provide services to the clients of each county that combines its funds with another county. This bill would provide that a county may only fund a domestic violence shelter-based program that is located outside of the county if the funding county is funding all domestic violence shelter-based programs located within its borders that meet the aforementioned requirements and the program located outside of the funding county provides services to residents of the funding county. »Less
Domestic violence: marriage license fees.
An act to amend Sections 26840.7 and 26840.8 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 18293, 18304, and 18305 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to domestic violence .
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance ... »More
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance of an authorization for the performance of marriages without a license, in the amount of $23. Existing law requires the additional $23 fee to be collected by the county clerk for deposit into county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. Existing law requires fees collected in the special funds to be disbursed to approved domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet certain requirements on a yearly or more frequent basis. This bill would authorize a county board of supervisors toauthorize an increase of the above-described fee from $23 to $33. Existing law provides that proposed or existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements shall receive funding from the county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. This bill would, instead, provide that only existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the requirements shall receive funding. Existing law requires the money in the special funds to be disbursed using a request for qualification (RFQ) process. This bill would require the RFQ process to involve a determination of whether a domestic violence shelter-based program meets the aforementioned requirements. If a domestic violence shelter-basedprogram meets those requirements, the bill would provide that the program has successfully completed the RFQ process. The bill would provide that an RFQ process shall not be construed to mean a competitive bidding process. Existing law authorizes a county to establish a program for reducing the incidence of domestic violence in the county by establishing or funding domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements. Existing law authorizes geographically adjacent counties to combine their respective domestic violence shelter-based programs funds in order to establish one or more domestic violence shelter-based programs, in order to provide services to the clients of each county that combines its funds with another county. This bill would provide that a county may only fund a domestic violence shelter-based program that is located outside of the countyif the funding county is funding all domestic violence shelter-based programs located within its borders that meet the aforementioned requirements and the program located outside of the funding county provides services to residents of the funding county. »Less
Domestic violence: marriage license fees.
An act to amend Sections 26840.7 and 26840.8 of the Government Code, and to amend Sections 18293, 18304, and 18305 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to domestic violence, and making an appropriation therefor.
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance ... »More
Digest: Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance of an authorization for the performance of marriages without a license, in the amount of $23. Existing law requires the additional $23 fee to be collected by the county clerk for deposit into county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. Existing law requires fees collected in the special funds to be disbursed to approved domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet certain requirements on a yearly or more frequent basis. This bill would increase the fee required to be collected for domesticviolence shelter-based programs to $33. Existing law provides that proposed or existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements shall receive funding from the county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. This bill would, instead, provide that only existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the requirements shall receive funding. Existing law requires the money in the special funds to be disbursed using a request for qualification (RFQ) process. This bill would require the RFQ process to involve a determination of whether a domestic violence shelter-based program meets the aforementioned requirements. If a domestic violence shelter-based program meets thoserequirements, the bill would provide that the program has successfully completed the RFQ process. The bill would provide that an RFQ process shall not be construed to mean a competitive bidding process. Existing law authorizes a county to establish a program for reducing the incidence of domestic violence in the county by establishing or funding domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements. Existing law authorizes geographically adjacent counties to combine their respective domestic violence shelter-based programs funds in order to establish one or more domestic violence shelter-based programs, in order to provide services to the clients of each county that combines its funds with another county. This bill would provide that a county may only fund a domestic violence shelter-based program that is located outside of the county if the fundingcounty is funding all domestic violence shelter-based programs located within its borders that meet the aforementioned requirements and the program located outside of the funding county provides services to residents of the funding county. This bill would result in a change in state taxes for the purpose of increasing state revenues within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 2 3 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. By providing for the expenditure of state tax revenue, this bill would make an appropriation. »Less
Digest: Existing law provides for the indemnification of victims and derivative victims of specified types of crimes from the Restitution Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board for these ... »More
Digest: Existing law provides for the indemnification of victims and derivative victims of specified types of crimes from the Restitution Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board for these purposes. Existing law requires the Maternal and Child Health Branch of the State Department of Public Health to administer a comprehensive shelter-based services grant program to battered womens shelters, as prescribed. This bill would, notwithstanding existing law, appropriate $16,300,000 from the Restitution Fund to the State Department of Public Health to be allocated for purposes of funding this program. »Less
Horse racing: parimutuel wagering: real time monitoring.
An act to amend Sections 19440 and 19616.51 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to horse racing .
Digest: Existing law provides that the California Horse Racing Board shall have all necessary powers to carry out the purposes of the Horse Racing Law and specifies certain responsibilities of the board. This bill would include, within those ... »More
Digest: Existing law provides that the California Horse Racing Board shall have all necessary powers to carry out the purposes of the Horse Racing Law and specifies certain responsibilities of the board. This bill would include, within those responsibilities of the board, providing real time transactional monitoring of all parimutuel wagering on California horse races and maintaining independent technology services for specified purposes. Existing law, effective July 1, 2009, provides that, notwithstanding any other provision of law and in lieu of any license fee payable to the state prescribed for or referred to in specified provisions of the Horse Racing Law, any association or fair that conducts a racing meeting shall pay a license fee to fund the California Horse Racing Board and the equine drug testing program in accordance with a formula devised by the board in consultation withthe industry, as provided. This bill would also require any association or fair that conducts a racing meeting to pay a license fee to the state to fund real time transactional monitoring of all parimutuel wagering on California horse races, as specified. »Less
May 13, 2009
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 849.)
Horse racing: parimutuel wagering: real time monitoring.
An act to amend Sections 19440 and 19616.51 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to horse racing, and making an appropriation therefor.
Digest: Existing law provides that the California Horse Racing Board shall have all necessary powers to carry out the purposes of the Horse Racing Law and specifies certain responsibilities of the board. This bill would include, within those ... »More
Digest: Existing law provides that the California Horse Racing Board shall have all necessary powers to carry out the purposes of the Horse Racing Law and specifies certain responsibilities of the board. This bill would include, within those responsibilities of the board, providing real time transactional monitoring of all parimutuel wagering on California horse races and maintaining independent technology services for specified purposes. Existing law, effective July 1, 2009, provides that, notwithstanding any other provision of law and in lieu of any license fee payable to the state prescribed for or referred to in specified provisions of the Horse Racing Law, any association or fair that conducts a racing meeting shall pay a license fee to fund the California Horse Racing Board and the equine drug testing program in accordance with a formula devised by the board in consultation with the industry, as provided. This bill would also require any association or fair that conducts a racing meeting to pay a license fee to the state to fund real time transactional monitoring of all parimutuel wagering onCalifornia horse races, as specified. Under existing law, funds deposited in the Fair and Exposition Fund are continuously appropriated for various regulatory and general governmental purposes. Because this revenue from license fees would be deposited into the continuously appropriated Fairs and Exposition Fund, the bill would make an appropriation. »Less
March 27, 2009
Set for hearing April 28.
March 19, 2009
To Com. on G.O.
March 2, 2009
Read first time.
Feb. 28, 2009
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
Feb. 27, 2009
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Horse racing: board powers: advance deposit wagering.
An act to amend Sections 19440 and 19604 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to horse racing, and making an appropriation therefor.
Digest: Existing law provides that the California Horse Racing Board shall have all necessary powers to carry out the purposes of the Horse Racing Law and specifies certain responsibilities of the board. This bill would include, within those ... »More
Digest: Existing law provides that the California Horse Racing Board shall have all necessary powers to carry out the purposes of the Horse Racing Law and specifies certain responsibilities of the board. This bill would include, within those responsibilities of the board, providing real time transactional monitoring of all parimutuel wagering on California horse races and maintaining independent technology services for specified purposes. Existing law authorizes advance deposit wagering to be conducted, upon the approval of the board. Existing law provides for various deductions and distributions by advance deposit wagering providers from advance deposit wagers, as provided. This bill would require every advance deposit wagering provider to deduct the sum of 0.33 of 1% from all of the amount handled on advance deposit wagers and to deposit thatsum with the board for the purpose of a parimutuel wagering monitoring system, as defined, and the regulation of horse racing. Under existing law, funds deposited in the Fair and Exposition Fund are continuously appropriated for various regulatory and general governmental purposes. Because this revenue from advance deposit wagering would be deposited into the continuously appropriated Fairs and Exposition Fund, the bill would make an appropriation. »Less
Headlines 1 - 10 (of 15):
Schwarzenegger vetoes bill on violence shelter fees North County Times, Oct. 2, 2010
... enegger and state lawmakers struggle to close a $19 billion budget deficit, she said. Yee's bill, SB662, would have provided additional money by letting counties raise a marriage fee that already goes to domestic violence programs from $23 to $33. The fee was last increased i ...
Gov. Vetoes Violence Shelter Fee Bill KCRA 3, Oct. 2, 2010
... ernative plan. Keigwin is spokesman for Sen. Leland Yee, a Democrat from San Francisco. Yee's bill, SB662, would have let counties raise a marriage fee that already goes to violence shelters from $23 to $33. The fee was last increased in 1993. The bill would have raised as much a ...
Schwarzenegger vetoes violence shelter fee bill North County Times, Oct. 2, 2010
... enegger and state lawmakers struggle to close a $19 billion budget deficit, she said. Yee's bill, SB662, would have provided additional money by letting counties raise a marriage fee that already goes to domestic violence programs from $23 to $33. The fee was last increased i ...
Schwarzenegger vetoes violence shelter fee bill Ventura County Star, Oct. 2, 2010
... zenegger and state lawmakers struggle to close a $19 billion budget deficit, she said. Yee's bill, SB662, would have provided additional money by letting counties raise a marriage fee that already goes to domestic violence programs from $23 to $33. The fee was last increased in ...
Schwarzenegger vetoes violence shelter fee bill KXTV Sacramento, Oct. 2, 2010
... native plan. Keigwin is spokesman for Sen. Leland Yee, a Democrat from San Francisco. Yee's bill, SB662, would have let counties raise a marriage fee that already goes to violence shelters from $23 to $33. The fee was last increased in 1993. The bill would have raised as much ...
Schwarzenegger vetoes violence shelter fee bill Fresno Bee, Oct. 2, 2010
... zenegger and state lawmakers struggle to close a $19 billion budget deficit, she said. Yee's bill, SB662, would have provided additional money by letting counties raise a marriage fee that already goes to domestic violence programs from $23 to $33. The fee was last increased in ...
Schwarzenegger vetoes violence shelter fee bill Sacramento Bee, Oct. 2, 2010
... ernative plan.Keigwin is spokesman for Sen. Leland Yee, a Democrat from San Francisco. Yee's bill, SB662, would have let counties raise a marriage fee that already goes to violence shelters from $23 to $33.The fee was last increased in 1993.The bill would have raised as much as ...
Schwarzenegger vetoes violence shelter fee bill San Diego Union-Tribune, Oct. 2, 2010
... zenegger and state lawmakers struggle to close a $19 billion budget deficit, she said. Yee's bill, SB662, would have provided additional money by letting counties raise a marriage fee that already goes to domestic violence programs from $23 to $33. The fee was last increased in ...
$10 fee on marriage licenses sought to support shelters Sacramento Bee, Aug. 27, 2010
$10 fee on marriage licenses sought to support shelters - Sacramento Politics - California Politics | Sacramento Bee var insitecookie = 'sacbee_user_auth' var mi = { "media_domain" : "http: } var thisArticleId = "2986275"; var thisArticleUrl = "/2010/08/27/2986275/digest.html"; var thisArticleTitle = "$10 fee on marriage licenses sought to support shelters"; var thisArticleSection = ...
Bill lets Calif. counties fund violence shelters Fresno Bee, Aug. 26, 2010
... crease would offset a drop in state funding that recently forced four shelters to close.Yee's bill, SB662, was approved on a 21-13 vote.The Senate also sent Schwarzenegger a second domestic violence bill by Yee, a Democrat from San Francisco. That bill, SB782, would protect vict ...
Version: Enrolled
Bill language:
